Contact Us
RssX

Wharton, T., Shah, A., Scogin, F. R. & Allen, R. S. (2013). Evidence to support the Pikes Peak model: The UA geropsychology education program. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7(2), 139-144. DOI: 10.1037/a0032285.

2013-05-31T16:04:35+00:00

Wharton, T., Shah, A., Scogin, F. R. & Allen, R. S. (2013). Evidence to support the Pikes Peak model: The UA geropsychology education program. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7(2), 139-144. DOI: 10.1037/a0032285.

Wharton, T., Shah, A., Scogin, F. R. & Allen, R. S. (2013). Evidence to support the Pikes Peak model: The UA geropsychology education program. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7(2), 139-144. DOI: 10.1037/a0032285.2013-05-31T16:04:35+00:00

The U.S. Congress marked May 2013, Older Americans Month, by recognizing the importance of key pieces of legislation targeting older adults. On Thursday, May 23, Senator Bernard Sanders (I-VT), Chairman of the Senate HELP Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging, introduced legislation to reauthorize the Older Americans Act (OAA), the Older Americans Act Amendments of 2013 (S. 1028; fact sheet). The Eldercare Workforce Alliance, of which APA is a member, issued a press release and submitted a letter of support for the legislation, highlighting provisions to support family caregivers and strengthen the eldercare workforce. APA Public Interest Government Relations Office (PI-GRO) staff participated in the OAA Summit on May 23, which is available on video stream, and will continue to work independently and with key coalitions to inform and promote a comprehensive reauthorization of the OAA that addresses the behavioral health, social service, and medical needs of older adults. APA PI-GRO has also been working with key congressional offices in the U.S. House and Senate to support the re-introduction of the Positive Aging Act. This critical piece of legislation would significantly improve access to quality mental and behavioral health care for older adults by integrating mental health services in primary care and community settings where older adults reside and receive services. Specifically, the bill would support efforts to develop inter-professional teams of mental health, medical, and social service providers in order to promote an integrated approach to addressing the health and well-being of our nation’s growing, increasingly diverse older adult population. APA will continue to advocate for the introduction and ultimate passage of this critical legislation in the 113th Congress, and will call upon APA members and experts in the field to support the bill as it moves through the legislative process. Nida H. Corry, PhD, Senior Legislative and Federal Affairs Officer; Director, Congressional Fellowship Program; Government Relations Office, Public Interest Directorate, American Psychological Association; [email protected]. Posted 5/30/13

2013-05-30T14:51:37+00:00

The U.S. Congress marked May 2013, Older Americans Month, by recognizing the importance of key pieces of legislation targeting older adults. On Thursday, May 23, Senator Bernard Sanders (I-VT), Chairman of the Senate HELP Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging, introduced legislation to reauthorize the Older Americans Act (OAA), the Older Americans Act Amendments of 2013 (S. 1028; fact sheet). The Eldercare Workforce Alliance, of which APA is a member, issued a press release and submitted a letter of support for the legislation, highlighting provisions to support family caregivers and strengthen the eldercare workforce. APA Public Interest Government Relations Office (PI-GRO) [...]

The U.S. Congress marked May 2013, Older Americans Month, by recognizing the importance of key pieces of legislation targeting older adults. On Thursday, May 23, Senator Bernard Sanders (I-VT), Chairman of the Senate HELP Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging, introduced legislation to reauthorize the Older Americans Act (OAA), the Older Americans Act Amendments of 2013 (S. 1028; fact sheet). The Eldercare Workforce Alliance, of which APA is a member, issued a press release and submitted a letter of support for the legislation, highlighting provisions to support family caregivers and strengthen the eldercare workforce. APA Public Interest Government Relations Office (PI-GRO) staff participated in the OAA Summit on May 23, which is available on video stream, and will continue to work independently and with key coalitions to inform and promote a comprehensive reauthorization of the OAA that addresses the behavioral health, social service, and medical needs of older adults. APA PI-GRO has also been working with key congressional offices in the U.S. House and Senate to support the re-introduction of the Positive Aging Act. This critical piece of legislation would significantly improve access to quality mental and behavioral health care for older adults by integrating mental health services in primary care and community settings where older adults reside and receive services. Specifically, the bill would support efforts to develop inter-professional teams of mental health, medical, and social service providers in order to promote an integrated approach to addressing the health and well-being of our nation’s growing, increasingly diverse older adult population. APA will continue to advocate for the introduction and ultimate passage of this critical legislation in the 113th Congress, and will call upon APA members and experts in the field to support the bill as it moves through the legislative process. Nida H. Corry, PhD, Senior Legislative and Federal Affairs Officer; Director, Congressional Fellowship Program; Government Relations Office, Public Interest Directorate, American Psychological Association; [email protected]. Posted 5/30/132013-05-30T14:51:37+00:00

Physician definition proposed to include psychologists! Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) has introduced S. 1064, legislation to include psychologists in the Medicare “physician” definition. This legislation is a companion bill to (H.R.794), introduced by Illinois’ very own Congresswoman Janice Schakowsky in the House of Representative earlier this year, which currently has 23 cosponsors. Now we need your help to build support for these bills by recruiting cosponsors! Please visit the APAPO Legislative Action Center and send letters to Senators and your local district Representative requesting support as a cosponsor of S.1064 and H.R. 794, respectively. When you contact your Representatives, please edit your correspondence to thank them if the member is currently a cosponsor. A link to the list of current cosponsors can be found below: Current list of Cosponsors Background: Congress Should Pass the Brown and Schakowsky Bill To Include Psychologists in Medicare’s “Physician” Definition Unnecessary physician supervision requirements in the Medicare program are hampering psychologists from providing to Medicare patients their full range of services within state licensure. Congress should pass the Sen. Sherrod Brown (S. 1064) and Rep. Jan Schakowsky (H.R. 794) bill to include psychologists in the Medicare “physician” definition. Psychologists are key Medicare mental health providers, delivering nearly half of the psychotherapy services to Medicare beneficiaries in the hospital outpatient setting and more than 70% of the psychotherapy services in the hospital inpatient, partial hospital, and residential care settings. Psychologists also provide the vast majority of mental health testing services, many of which are unique to their training and licensure. The Brown/Schakowsky bill is supported by consumer and provider organizations, including: American Federation of Teachers American Foundation for Suicide Prevention American Group Psychotherapy Association American Psychological Association Association for Ambulatory Behavioral Healthcare Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc. Mental Health America National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare The Brown/Schakowsky bill will allow psychologists to be treated like all other non-physician providers already included in the Medicare physician definition, thereby ending unnecessary physician supervision without increasing Medicare costs. Psychologists provide critical care to beneficiaries in a range of Medicare settings, including the inpatient hospital, psychiatric hospital, hospital outpatient, partial hospital, comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility, rural health clinic, federally qualified health center, and skilled nursing facility settings. Inclusion of psychologists in the physician definition will provide for a long-overdue reassessment of the services psychologists may provide within licensure without supervision. In inpatient hospital and psychiatric hospital settings, this bill would enhance psychologists’ ability to direct appropriate care for their patients. Psychologists are licensed to assess, diagnose and treat mental and substance use disorders and are already key providers in these settings, but they are often hindered by inappropriate physician supervision of services provided within their licensure. This overdue change would help clarify clinical oversight for hospital patients under the care of psychologists and reduce the administrative burden on hospital staff. In outpatient hospital and community mental health center settings, Medicare patients who would otherwise need inpatient psychiatric care are provided partial hospital services. Psychologists run partial hospital programs in the private health system today—overseeing, supervising and providing treatment—yet Medicare requires that such services must be prescribed by a physician, provided under a written treatment plan established and periodically reviewed by a physician, and furnished while under the care of a physician. If these physician barriers were removed, beneficiaries would have better access to partial hospital services they need. An actuarial analysis of the Brown and Schakowsky bill has determined that including psychologists in the Medicare physician definition will not increase Medicare claims costs. Psychologists already provide their services in settings throughout the program and sufficient provisions will remain in place to ensure that the services psychologists provide are medically necessary and appropriate. Including psychologists in the Medicare physician definition does not make them physicians, but it does remove barriers to the services they provide. Medicare’s physician definition (1861(r) of the Social Security Act) already encompasses non-physician providers. Dentists, podiatrists, optometrists and chiropractors are included in the Medicare physician definition so that they may provide services to the full extent of their licensure. Inclusion of psychologists would not reconstitute them as physicians or expand their scope of practice. Only state licensure law can do that. But as with the other non-physician providers in the definition, psychologists will be able to serve Medicare beneficiaries to the full extent of their licensure. In fact, psychologists are the only doctoral-trained health care practitioners not in the physician definition. As a result, the Medicare program has fallen behind the private insurance market. Many insurers already define “physician” to include not only medical doctors and doctors of osteopathy, but also psychologists and other non-physicians currently in the Medicare physician definition. Including psychologists in the physician definition will particularly help Medicare beneficiaries in rural areas where psychiatrists are not available to provide supervision. Based on a 2007 APAPO study prepared by the Center for Health Policy, Planning and Research at the University of New England, there are 2,943 psychiatrists in non-Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the U.S.—a rate of 5.2 psychiatrists per 100,000 population. There are three times as many psychologists in these areas—8,867 psychologists or a rate of 15.7 psychologists per 100,000 population. The lack of psychiatrists to supervise treatment in the various Medicare settings has stifled the development of mental health services delivery in rural areas. If, for example, a physician is not available to supervise partial hospital services in a rural area, then such services are not provided. Removing unnecessary physician supervision requirements will help remedy rural access to mental health services. Psychologists will be able to provide partial hospital services within their licensure without unnecessary physician oversight while still working with physicians regarding medication and other services beyond their licensure. Congress references the Medicare physician definition in enacting laws to improve beneficiary access to services. Since psychologists are not included, mental health services are too often left behind. For example, Medicare “physicians,” including chiropractors, optometrists and podiatrists, receive a 10% bonus payment for providing services in Health Professional Shortage Areas. By excluding psychologists, mental health services are mostly left out of bonus payments designed to improve Medicare beneficiary access in underserved areas. Also, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act provides for incentive payments to Medicare “physicians,” including chiropractors, optometrists and podiatrists, when they adopt electronic medical records into their practices. With the exclusion of psychologists from these payments, mental health is essentially left out in the development of electronic medical records in the Medicare program. Thanks for your help! Patricia Farrell PhD, Federal Advocacy Coordinator, President, Il Psychological Association Posted 5/30/13

2013-05-30T14:27:43+00:00

Physician definition proposed to include psychologists!  Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) has introduced S. 1064, legislation to include psychologists in the Medicare “physician” definition. This legislation is a companion bill to (H.R.794), introduced by Illinois' very own Congresswoman Janice Schakowsky in the House of Representative earlier this year, which currently has 23 cosponsors. Now we need your help to build support for these bills by recruiting cosponsors! Please visit the APAPO Legislative Action Center and send letters to Senators and your local district Representative requesting support as a cosponsor of S.1064 and H.R. 794, respectively. When you contact your Representatives, please [...]

Physician definition proposed to include psychologists! Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) has introduced S. 1064, legislation to include psychologists in the Medicare “physician” definition. This legislation is a companion bill to (H.R.794), introduced by Illinois’ very own Congresswoman Janice Schakowsky in the House of Representative earlier this year, which currently has 23 cosponsors. Now we need your help to build support for these bills by recruiting cosponsors! Please visit the APAPO Legislative Action Center and send letters to Senators and your local district Representative requesting support as a cosponsor of S.1064 and H.R. 794, respectively. When you contact your Representatives, please edit your correspondence to thank them if the member is currently a cosponsor. A link to the list of current cosponsors can be found below: Current list of Cosponsors Background: Congress Should Pass the Brown and Schakowsky Bill To Include Psychologists in Medicare’s “Physician” Definition Unnecessary physician supervision requirements in the Medicare program are hampering psychologists from providing to Medicare patients their full range of services within state licensure. Congress should pass the Sen. Sherrod Brown (S. 1064) and Rep. Jan Schakowsky (H.R. 794) bill to include psychologists in the Medicare “physician” definition. Psychologists are key Medicare mental health providers, delivering nearly half of the psychotherapy services to Medicare beneficiaries in the hospital outpatient setting and more than 70% of the psychotherapy services in the hospital inpatient, partial hospital, and residential care settings. Psychologists also provide the vast majority of mental health testing services, many of which are unique to their training and licensure. The Brown/Schakowsky bill is supported by consumer and provider organizations, including: American Federation of Teachers American Foundation for Suicide Prevention American Group Psychotherapy Association American Psychological Association Association for Ambulatory Behavioral Healthcare Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc. Mental Health America National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare The Brown/Schakowsky bill will allow psychologists to be treated like all other non-physician providers already included in the Medicare physician definition, thereby ending unnecessary physician supervision without increasing Medicare costs. Psychologists provide critical care to beneficiaries in a range of Medicare settings, including the inpatient hospital, psychiatric hospital, hospital outpatient, partial hospital, comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility, rural health clinic, federally qualified health center, and skilled nursing facility settings. Inclusion of psychologists in the physician definition will provide for a long-overdue reassessment of the services psychologists may provide within licensure without supervision. In inpatient hospital and psychiatric hospital settings, this bill would enhance psychologists’ ability to direct appropriate care for their patients. Psychologists are licensed to assess, diagnose and treat mental and substance use disorders and are already key providers in these settings, but they are often hindered by inappropriate physician supervision of services provided within their licensure. This overdue change would help clarify clinical oversight for hospital patients under the care of psychologists and reduce the administrative burden on hospital staff. In outpatient hospital and community mental health center settings, Medicare patients who would otherwise need inpatient psychiatric care are provided partial hospital services. Psychologists run partial hospital programs in the private health system today—overseeing, supervising and providing treatment—yet Medicare requires that such services must be prescribed by a physician, provided under a written treatment plan established and periodically reviewed by a physician, and furnished while under the care of a physician. If these physician barriers were removed, beneficiaries would have better access to partial hospital services they need. An actuarial analysis of the Brown and Schakowsky bill has determined that including psychologists in the Medicare physician definition will not increase Medicare claims costs. Psychologists already provide their services in settings throughout the program and sufficient provisions will remain in place to ensure that the services psychologists provide are medically necessary and appropriate. Including psychologists in the Medicare physician definition does not make them physicians, but it does remove barriers to the services they provide. Medicare’s physician definition (1861(r) of the Social Security Act) already encompasses non-physician providers. Dentists, podiatrists, optometrists and chiropractors are included in the Medicare physician definition so that they may provide services to the full extent of their licensure. Inclusion of psychologists would not reconstitute them as physicians or expand their scope of practice. Only state licensure law can do that. But as with the other non-physician providers in the definition, psychologists will be able to serve Medicare beneficiaries to the full extent of their licensure. In fact, psychologists are the only doctoral-trained health care practitioners not in the physician definition. As a result, the Medicare program has fallen behind the private insurance market. Many insurers already define “physician” to include not only medical doctors and doctors of osteopathy, but also psychologists and other non-physicians currently in the Medicare physician definition. Including psychologists in the physician definition will particularly help Medicare beneficiaries in rural areas where psychiatrists are not available to provide supervision. Based on a 2007 APAPO study prepared by the Center for Health Policy, Planning and Research at the University of New England, there are 2,943 psychiatrists in non-Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the U.S.—a rate of 5.2 psychiatrists per 100,000 population. There are three times as many psychologists in these areas—8,867 psychologists or a rate of 15.7 psychologists per 100,000 population. The lack of psychiatrists to supervise treatment in the various Medicare settings has stifled the development of mental health services delivery in rural areas. If, for example, a physician is not available to supervise partial hospital services in a rural area, then such services are not provided. Removing unnecessary physician supervision requirements will help remedy rural access to mental health services. Psychologists will be able to provide partial hospital services within their licensure without unnecessary physician oversight while still working with physicians regarding medication and other services beyond their licensure. Congress references the Medicare physician definition in enacting laws to improve beneficiary access to services. Since psychologists are not included, mental health services are too often left behind. For example, Medicare “physicians,” including chiropractors, optometrists and podiatrists, receive a 10% bonus payment for providing services in Health Professional Shortage Areas. By excluding psychologists, mental health services are mostly left out of bonus payments designed to improve Medicare beneficiary access in underserved areas. Also, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act provides for incentive payments to Medicare “physicians,” including chiropractors, optometrists and podiatrists, when they adopt electronic medical records into their practices. With the exclusion of psychologists from these payments, mental health is essentially left out in the development of electronic medical records in the Medicare program. Thanks for your help! Patricia Farrell PhD, Federal Advocacy Coordinator, President, Il Psychological Association Posted 5/30/132013-05-30T14:27:43+00:00

Balancing Incentive Program: Highlighting State Approaches and Progress. WEBINAR MAY 30 02:00 PM ET – 03:30 PM ET. The Balancing Incentive Program is a time-limited opportunity for states to receive additional federal funding to improve access to home and community-based services and make structural changes. States spending less than 50% of their total long-term services and supports funding on community-based services are eligible. Thirteen states have received awards totaling approximately $1.7 billion. Additional states must apply by Aug. 1, 2014. This webinar will highlight the work of three states that have received awards: Texas, Indiana, and Missouri. States will discuss the application process, requirements, and how they are using the program. Posted 5/21/13.

2013-05-21T17:05:14+00:00

Balancing Incentive Program: Highlighting State Approaches and Progress.   NCOA Webinar MAY 30 02:00 PM ET - 03:30 PM ET.  The Balancing Incentive Program is a time-limited opportunity for states to receive additional federal funding to improve access to home and community-based services and make structural changes.  States spending less than 50% of their total long-term services and supports funding on community-based services are eligible. Thirteen states have received awards totaling approximately $1.7 billion. Additional states must apply by Aug. 1, 2014.  This webinar will highlight the work of three states that have received awards: Texas, Indiana, and Missouri. States will [...]

Balancing Incentive Program: Highlighting State Approaches and Progress. WEBINAR MAY 30 02:00 PM ET – 03:30 PM ET. The Balancing Incentive Program is a time-limited opportunity for states to receive additional federal funding to improve access to home and community-based services and make structural changes. States spending less than 50% of their total long-term services and supports funding on community-based services are eligible. Thirteen states have received awards totaling approximately $1.7 billion. Additional states must apply by Aug. 1, 2014. This webinar will highlight the work of three states that have received awards: Texas, Indiana, and Missouri. States will discuss the application process, requirements, and how they are using the program. Posted 5/21/13.2013-05-21T17:05:14+00:00

Pachana, N. A., Sofronoff, K., Scott, T. & Helmes, E. (2011). Attainment of Competencies in Clinical Psychology Training: Ways Forward in the Australian Context. Australian Psychologist, 46: 67–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00029.x

2013-05-20T18:21:28+00:00

Pachana, N. A., Sofronoff, K., Scott, T. & Helmes, E. (2011). Attainment of Competencies in Clinical Psychology Training: Ways Forward in the Australian Context. Australian Psychologist, 46: 67–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00029.x

Pachana, N. A., Sofronoff, K., Scott, T. & Helmes, E. (2011). Attainment of Competencies in Clinical Psychology Training: Ways Forward in the Australian Context. Australian Psychologist, 46: 67–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00029.x2013-05-20T18:21:28+00:00

Gallagher-Thompson, D. & Cassidy, E. L. (2000), Training Psychologists for Service Delivery in Long-Term Care Settings. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7: 329–336. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.7.3.329

2013-05-20T18:18:45+00:00

Gallagher-Thompson, D. & Cassidy, E. L. (2000), Training Psychologists for Service Delivery in Long-Term Care Settings. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7: 329–336. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.7.3.329

Gallagher-Thompson, D. & Cassidy, E. L. (2000), Training Psychologists for Service Delivery in Long-Term Care Settings. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7: 329–336. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.7.3.3292013-05-20T18:18:45+00:00

Helmes, E. & Gee, S. (2000), Development of a Training Program in Clinical Geropsychology. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 19: 113–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2000.tb00160.x

2013-05-20T18:17:03+00:00

Helmes, E. & Gee, S. (2000), Development of a Training Program in Clinical Geropsychology. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 19: 113–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2000.tb00160.x

Helmes, E. & Gee, S. (2000), Development of a Training Program in Clinical Geropsychology. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 19: 113–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2000.tb00160.x2013-05-20T18:17:03+00:00

Karel, M. J., Gatz, M. & Smyer, M. A. (2012). Aging and mental health in the decade ahead: What psychologists need to know. American Psychologist, 67, 184-198.

2013-05-17T19:53:28+00:00

Karel, M. J., Gatz, M. & Smyer, M. A. (2012). Aging and mental health in the decade ahead: What psychologists need to know. American Psychologist, 67, 184-198.

Karel, M. J., Gatz, M. & Smyer, M. A. (2012). Aging and mental health in the decade ahead: What psychologists need to know. American Psychologist, 67, 184-198.2013-05-17T19:53:28+00:00

O’Rourke N., Carmel, S., Chaudhury, H., Polchenko, N., & Bachner, Y.G. (2013). A cross-national comparison of reminiscence functions between Canadian and Israeli older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(2), 184–192, doi:10.1093/geronb/gbs058. *Note: this article includes methodology regarding internet recruitment with older adults.

2013-05-07T19:51:24+00:00

O’Rourke N., Carmel, S., Chaudhury, H., Polchenko, N., & Bachner, Y.G. (2013). A cross-national comparison of reminiscence functions between Canadian and Israeli older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(2), 184–192, doi:10.1093/geronb/gbs058.      *Note: this article includes methodology regarding internet recruitment with older adults.

O’Rourke N., Carmel, S., Chaudhury, H., Polchenko, N., & Bachner, Y.G. (2013). A cross-national comparison of reminiscence functions between Canadian and Israeli older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(2), 184–192, doi:10.1093/geronb/gbs058. *Note: this article includes methodology regarding internet recruitment with older adults.2013-05-07T19:51:24+00:00

National Council on Aging webinar: Using Social Media to Advance Your Mission and Program Reach. May 29, 2013; 03:00 PM ET – 04:30 PM ET.

2013-05-07T19:45:33+00:00

National Council on Aging webinar: Using Social Media to Advance Your Mission and Program Reach. May 29, 2013;  03:00 PM ET - 04:30 PM ET.  Events are archived on the NCOA website.

National Council on Aging webinar: Using Social Media to Advance Your Mission and Program Reach. May 29, 2013; 03:00 PM ET – 04:30 PM ET.2013-05-07T19:45:33+00:00

May is National Mental Health Month! Read the Presidential Proclamation. “… I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 2013 as National Mental Health Awareness Month. I call upon citizens, government agencies, organizations, health care providers, and research institutions to raise mental health awareness and continue helping Americans live longer, healthier lives.” Posted 5-2-13.

2013-05-02T14:49:29+00:00

May is National Mental Health Month!  Read the Presidential Proclamation. "... I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 2013 as National Mental Health Awareness Month. I call upon citizens, government agencies, organizations, health care providers, and research institutions to raise mental health awareness and continue helping Americans live longer, healthier lives."   Posted 5-2-13.  

May is National Mental Health Month! Read the Presidential Proclamation. “… I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 2013 as National Mental Health Awareness Month. I call upon citizens, government agencies, organizations, health care providers, and research institutions to raise mental health awareness and continue helping Americans live longer, healthier lives.” Posted 5-2-13.2013-05-02T14:49:29+00:00
© GeroCentral.org. All rights reserved.
RssX
Go to Top